By Chouraqui, Frank; Merleau-Ponty, Maurice; Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm

This article seeks to make contributions to the heritage of contemporary philosophy by way of setting up a structural hyperlink among the innovations of Friedrich Nietzsche and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. it's meant as a scientific exposition of either philosopher's key options, in addition to an inquiry at the origins of so-called continental philosophy.

summary:

Seeks to contribute to the heritage of recent philosophy via setting up a structural hyperlink among the suggestions of Friedrich Nietzsche and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Read more...

Show description

Read Online or Download Ambiguity and the absolute : Nietzsche and Merleau-Ponty on the question of truth PDF

Best epistemology books

Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy

Friedrich Nietzsche haunts the trendy international. His elusive writings with their attribute blend of trenchant research of the trendy challenge and suggestive yet ambiguous proposals for facing it have interested generations of artists, students, critics, philosophers, and traditional readers.

The Philosophy of Agamben (Continental European Philosophy)

Giorgio Agamben has received common reputation lately for his rethinking of radical politics and his method of metaphysics and language. although, the intense breadth of historic, criminal and philosophical assets which give a contribution to the complexity and intensity of Agamben's considering may also make his paintings intimidating.

Facts and the Function of Truth (Philosophy of Theory)

This ebook examines the excellence among fact-stating and non-fact-stating makes use of of language. This contrast is necessary in lots of components of recent philosophy and is vital to "non-factualism"; the view that regardless of appearances, yes components of discourse usually are not genuine. those purposes in most cases think that the thought of assertion of truth might be analysed in a single of 3 methods: semantically, metapysically and psychologically.

Knowledge and belief: An introduction to the logic of the two notions

Wisdom and trust An creation to the common sense of the 2 Notions by way of Jaakko Hintikka ready by means of Vincent F. Hendricks & John Symons In 1962 Jaakko Hintikka released wisdom and trust: An advent to the good judgment of the 2 Notions with Cornell college Press. nearly each paper or a e-book on epistemic and doxastic common sense that has seemed on the grounds that then has pointed out this seminal paintings.

Additional info for Ambiguity and the absolute : Nietzsche and Merleau-Ponty on the question of truth

Sample text

At this point, Nietzsche can no longer be satisfied by refuting truth (the truth of morals, for example). He must also explain how, if morals are not true, we came to believe in them, and it is at this stage that Nietzsche becomes confronted by the question of truth as defined above. If Nietzsche’s case against morals is to be persuasive, he must explain how we came to think of the backworlds as true. For Nietzsche, this is a particularly difficult point since he defines truth empirically. Something truly exists only if I have a physical “interest” in it (if it is physically threatening or desirable)—that is to say, what is true must be spatio-temporal.

In Lampert’s view, this aphorism is related not to Descartes’s cogito as presented in his Discourse and in his Second Meditation, but to his Treatise of Passions, “the book that sets forth the first modern account of soul as an epiphenomenon of the machinery of the human body” (Lampert , n–).  Unlike Lampert, it does not seem to me that in this passage Nietzsche criticizes the non-physicality of the “soul” as much as he criticizes the notion of an independent subject, incarnate or not.

Platonic objectivism, by contrast, “is the view that there are [. ” Although it may seem useful, this division between Kantian and Platonic objectivism is clearly foreign to Nietzsche. ” This nuance has important consequences because it allows us to understand that the aim of Nietzsche’s argument is not such and such specific value but the structure of valuation itself.  It is thus a realism of the Platonic sort (which includes the Kantian version) that occupies Nietzsche. He remarks that no moral system has ever been able to liberate values from their dependence on reality.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.53 of 5 – based on 9 votes